Biyernes, Marso 20, 2015

K + 12 Curriculum



















THE TEACHING COMPETENCIES AND DIFFICULTY ENCOUNTERED BY SECONDARY SCHOOL TEACHERS ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF K12 CURRICULUM IN THE DISTRICT OF NEW WASHINGTON: BASIS FOR POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS








I.                    Introduction
A major change in our country’s educational landscape is about to take place: the Department of Education (DepEd) launched the K-12 curriculum.
According to President Benigno S. Aquino, “We need to add two years to our basic education. Those who can afford pay up to fourteen years of schooling before university. Thus, their children are getting into the best jobs after graduation. I want at least 12years for our public school children to give them an even chance at succeeding.” In line with this, the 1987 Philippine Constitution states that, “The State shall establish, maintain, and support a complete, adequate, and integrated system of education relevant to the needs of the people and the society.” Such mandate give justice to the basic rights of every Filipino child: the right to quality education and the right to a quality life.
At present, the Philippines is the only country in Asia and among the three remaining countries in the world that uses a 10-year basic education cycle. According to a presentation made by the South East Asian Ministers of Education Organization (SEAMEO-INNOTECH) on Additional Years in Philippine Basic Education (2010), the comparative data on duration of Basic and Pre-University Education in Asia shows that the Philippines allots 10 years not just for the basic education cycle but also for the pre-university education while all the other countries have either 11 or 12 years in their basic education cycle.
The present curriculum is described as congested. This means that students do not get enough time to perform tasks because the curriculum is designed to be taught in a span of 12 years and not 10 years. The more obvious result of this is the fact that most high school students graduate without the readiness to take upon higher education or employment.
Most importantly, the system aims to fully enhance and develop the students in order for them to be well-prepared especially in emotional and cognitive aspects. Through this, graduates will be able to face the pressures of their future workplace.
Given all these supporting facts, there is indeed a need to improve the quality of basic education by enhancing it and by expanding the basic education cycle (Velasco,2012). Hence, this study.
Theoretical Framework
In this study, the Social Cognition Learning Model will be used. The model asserts that culture is the prime determinant of individual development. According to this model, humans are the only species to have created culture, and every human child develops in the context of a culture. Therefore, a child’s learning development is affected in ways large and small by the culture – including the culture of family environment – in which he or she is enmeshed (http://crescentok.com/staff/jaskew/isr/education/theories.htm).




Conceptual Framework
            Independent Variables                                                             Dependent Variables
Flowchart: Direct Access Storage: Personal Characteristics
♂ Age
♂ Gender
♂ Years of Work Experiences
♂ Highest Degree Earned


 

                                                     

 

          
Flowchart: Direct Access Storage: Teaching Competence
♂ Instructional Competency
♂ Educational Leadership
    Competency
♂ Personal and Social
 











Figure 1. Conceptual Framework showing the relationship between the Dependent Variables and Independent Variables

Objectives of Study
This study aims at investigating the teaching competency and difficulty of Secondary School Teachers on the implementation of K-12 Curriculum in the District of New Washington for the School Year 2013-2014. Specifically, the objectives of the study will be:
1.      To find out the personal characteristics of the respondents;
2.      To find out the level of teaching competencies and the difficulties encountered of the respondents in terms of: instructional competencies, educational leadership competencies, personal and social competencies; and
3.      To find out the relationship between level of teaching competencies and personal characteristics.
Significance of the Study
            The study attempts to establish baseline information on the level of teaching competencies and difficulties  encountered by secondary school teachers on the implementation of K-12 Curriculum. The findings of the study may be of value to the teachers. These people are tasked with the successful implementation of the educational goals and objectives of producing quality  students. The results of the present study may provide them the relevant information of the strong points of teachers.
            The study might help researches and decision makers in assessing staff members’ educational competencies and taking the necessary measures to overcome any possible problems in this area.
            The study results might shed light on some facts of importance to everybody who is interested in this area of research, as well as to school authorities wishing to enhance the educational process for teachers in Aklan.
Scope and Delimitation of the Study
            This study attempts to establish the teaching competencies and difficulties encountered by secondary school teachers on the implementation of K-12 Curriculum in the District of New Washington. Complete enumeration will be done to assess their level of teaching competencies.
Definition of Terms
            To insure clarity and precision, the following terms will be defined as used in this study.
            “K-12 means “Kindergarten and the 12 years of elementary and secondary education.” Kindergarten points to the 5-year old child who undertakes the standardized curriculum for preschoolers. Elementary education refers to 6 years of primary school (Grades 1-6) while secondary education means four years of junior high school (Grades 7-10 or HS Year 1-4). In addition to this, two years are now allotted for senior high school (Grades 11-12 or HS Year 5-6) (DepEd Primer,2011).
            K-12 means extending basic education by two years, so instead of having a high school graduate at 16 years old, we will have high schools graduating at 18 (Calingasan,2012).
            K-12 curriculum- According to the DepEd discussion paper (2010), the K-12 curriculum aims to enable every child “to achieve mastery of core competencies and skills” (p.6) and develop tracks based on the student’s interests and competencies. The focus of K-12 is twofold: curriculum enhancement and transition management.
            Curriculum enhancement – With the K-6-4-2 model, the two years for senior high school is aimed at giving the students time to strengthen competencies and academic skills. The curriculum will also provide specializations in the following: science and technology, music and arts, agriculture and fisheries, sports, business and entrepreneurship, etc. depending on the occupation or career that they intend to pursue. These two years will build on skills that are essential to their chosen field.
            Transition management- The DepEd mentions in their discussion paper (2010) that they are “preparing a carefully sequenced implementation plan to ensure smooth transition with the least disruption” in the current program.
            Teacher – a person who teaches or instruct, as a profession (http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/teacher).
            Competencies – are the requirements of a competency based teacher education, which includes knowledge, skills and values the trainee teacher must demonstrate for successful completion of the teacher education  program (Houstan 1987).
            In this study, this term refers to the teaching competencies in terms of instructional competency, educational leadership competency and personal and social competency.
Review of Related Literature and Studies
The K to 12 Program
            The K to 12 Program covers kindergarten and 12 years of basic education (six years of primary education, four years of junior high school, and two years of senior high school [SHS]) to provide sufficient time for mastery of concepts and skills, develop lifelong learners, and prepare graduates for tertiary education, middle-level skills development, employment, and entrepreneurship.
            The adoption of the program is in response to the need to improve the competitiveness of our country’s graduates as the ten-year basic education cycle is seen as inadequate for work and higher education. In fact, overseas Filipino workers are not automatically recognized as professionals in other countries that view the ten-year education program as insufficient. The Philippines is the only country in Asia and is one of only three countries in the world with a ten-year basic education cycle.
A.     Salient Features
1.         Universal Kindergarten Education. Kindergarten has now been integrated into the basic education system to ensure that all grade 1 students are ready for academic learning. Universal kindergarten started in SY 2011-2012 with a budget of P2.3 billion and was made mandatory starting SY 2012-2013 through the signing of Republic Act No. 10157 entitled “An Act Institutionalizing the Kindergarten Education into the Basic Education System and Appropriating Funds Therefore” on January 20,2012.
            In SY 2012-2013, an estimated 2.3 million five-year-old children will enter kindergarten, of which 1.7 million (74percent) will be served by public schools.
2.      Mother Tongue-Based Multilingual Education. The mother tongue will be the medium of instruction from kindergarten to grade 3. This includes the following: Tagalog, Kapampangan, Pangasinense, Iloko, Bikol, Cebuano, Hiligaynon, Waray, Tausug, Maguindanaoan, and Chabacano. Medium of instruction will be English and Filipino starting grdae 4.
3.      Core Academic Areas. The core academic areas include Math; Filipino; English; Araling Panlipunan; Edukasyon sa Pagpapakatao; and Music, Arts, Physical Education, and Health (MAPEH). These are based on the College Readiness Standards of the Commission on Higher Education and are equivalent to the courses offered under the General Education Curriculum of the Higher Education Institutions.
Science will be taught in grade 3, but it is concepts will be integrated in other subjects like Health (under MAPEH), Math, and Languages in grades 1 and 2 Edukasyong Pangtahanan at Pangkabuhayan will be taught starting in grade 4. Technology and Livelihood Education and technical-vocational specializations, consistent with the Technical Education and Skills Development Authority training regulations, will start in grade 7.
4.      Specializations. The additional two years (grade 11 and 12 or SHS will allow students to choose among academic, technical-vocational, or sports and arts tracks depending on their interest, the community needs, and the results of their skills assessment. The SHS will allow mastery of core competencies for lifelong learning and preparedness for work, higher education, middle-level skills development, or entrepreneurship.
B.     Implementation and Transition Management
Program implementation will be in phases starting this June for SY 2012-2013. Grade 1 entrants in 2012-2013 will be the first batch to fully undergo the program, and incoming first-year high school students (or grade 7) in SY 2012-2013 will be the first to undergo the junior high school curriculum. To prepare teachers for the new curriculum, a nationwide summer training program for about 140,000 grades 1 and 7 public school teachers will be held in May. The Department of Education (DepEd) is also working with various private school associations to cover teachers in private schools. To facilitate the transition from the existing ten-year basic education to 12 years, the DepEd will also implement the SHS Readiness Assessment and K to 12 Modeling.
According to Education Secretary Br. Armin A. Luistro (2012) the new curriculum is focused more on the learners and not on the teacher. Luistro said, “We are making it a real learning experiences for the students, meaning, it will be less on memorization and more encouraging of critical thinking”. In addition to this, a mother tongue-based multi-lingual education (MTB-MLE) will be used for instruction in Kinder to Grade 3 classes after studies showed that students learn more when their language at home is used in discussing the lessons in school. Also, there will be less contact time as Grade 1 pupils will only attend school for half a day instead of 6 hours. Luistro explains, It is important that our learners develop that natural love for learning and not feel that it is something imposed on them….we will reduce it to four hours to make education less stressful and more enjoyable.
For the first year high school curriculum, Luistro mentions that the lessons will be more interactive and meaningful to everyday life. This means that Science will be reflected in terms of its practical use. He further explains, “as students go up the ladder, we want them to learn skills that are being demanded by employers while at the same time giving them the chance to appreciate and enjoy lessons”. For instance, Luistro stresses that science is to be integrated in all learning areas since it is a complex subject. He further expounds, “the focus of early education (Kinder to Grade 2 should be the fundamental skills and literacy of the pupils to develop better comprehension for more complicated subjects such as science”.
A study done by SEAMEO points out that the current curriculum allots about 1,100 minutes per week in elementary education to Science, which will change with the introduction of K-12. Luistro says, “this, coupled with teaching more competencies, imply congestion in our current elementary Science curriculum.” To address this, Science will now be integrated into the teaching of the Language, Mathematics and Health under MAPEH subjects beginning at Kindergarten.
Prof. Calingasan further explains that the K-12 curriculum for Social Studies will instead center on historical thinking skills rather than memory work (of dates, names, regions, capitals, etc.) and accumulation of facts. She mentions examples of thinking skills such as “weighing the evidence of any information, using primary source evidence, analyzing and interpreting information, manifesting ethical standards(e.g.,respect for differences, recognition of sources of evidence/idea). The K-12 Social Studies curriculum will also teach students about local history (http://www.smartparenting.com.ph/kids/preschooler/k-12-101-a-primer-on-the-new-philippine-education-curriculum)
Benefits of K-12
The DepEd primer(2011) specifies the benefits to individuals and families:
1.      A decongested academic workload, giving students more time to master competencies and for co-curriculur activities and community involvement, thus, allowing for a more holistic development;
2.      Graduates will process competencies and skills relevant to the job market and they will be prepared for higher education;
3.      K-12 is affordable;
4.      The potential annual earnings of a K-12 graduate will be higher compared to the earnings of a 10year high school graduate;
5.      Graduates will be recognized abroad.
The benefits of K-12 curriculum for the society and the economy are:
1.      It will contribute to economic growth. Studies show that improvements in the quality of education increases GDP growth. According to the DepEd (2010), studies in the country have reflected that an additional year of school increases the earnings by 7.5% and that improvements in the quality of education will enable the GDP grow by 2-2.2%.
2.      It will facilitate the recognition of Filipino graduates and professionals in other countries
3.      A better educated society provides a sound foundation for long-term socio-economic development.
Goal
            The goal of the K-12 curriculum is to create a purposeful basic education system that will “produce productive, responsible citizens equipped with the essential competencies and skills for both life-long learning and employment”.
Government Interventions to Address Basic Education Input Gaps.
The DepEd budget was increased by 15 percent from P207 billion in 2011 to P238.8 billion in 2012, which is being utilized to address the basic education input gaps, among others.
A.     Classrooms
As of January 27,2012, the following are the government’s accomplishments on classroom construction:
2010 GAA
2011 GAA
Target
Classroom construction
Percentage
Target
Classroom construction
Percentage
2,472
2,383
(2,218 complete; 165 ongoing)
96.40
8,133
7,089
(4,447 complete; 2,642 ongoing)
87.16


B.     Teachers
As of February 29,2012, 94.86 percent of the 10,000 CY 2011 new teaching positions approved by the Department of Budget and Management has been filled. To fast-track the construction of classrooms, the Public-Private Partnership for School Infrastructure Project will be implemented from July 2012 to July 2013 with a project cost of P9.8 billion. A total of 9,332 classrooms will be constructed in 2,262 elementary and secondary schools in three pre-identified regions (I, III, and IV-A) with the highest classroom shortages.
C.     Toilets
Between 2010 and 2011, 978 of the targeted 1,396 toilets have been repaired.
D.     Textbooks
With the CY 2010 and 2011 procurement, the DepEd will be able to achieve a 1:1 student to textbook ratio in SY 2012-2013. By SY 2012-2013, the DepEd will have a zero backlog on textbooks.
E.      Seats
Between 2010 and 2011, 1301,506 of the targeted 1,461,963 school seats have been procured.
Studies on Teaching Competencies
            Clay, (1994) conducted a study which aimed at identifying the educational technology competences among 164 junior high school teachers who graduated in Bermidji University as well as 86 university staff members. The research used a questionnaire that included 33 competencies as specified by the International Association for Educational Technology. The results indicated that the teachers’ competencies were far behind the university staff expectations. The staff member’s competencies on the other hand, were far behind the international standards.
            Speight, (1994) conducted a study to evaluate the educational technology competencies among 138 teachers who studied in 9 different American universities. The results showed that the majority of teachers have acquired the necessary educational technology competencies. The teachers asserted the importance of their training programs and the necessity of achieving consistency between the training programs in the American universities and the standards specified by the International Council for Teachers Training.
            Kim, (1993) conducted a study to investigate the extent to which the educational technology competencies are utilized by Korean teachers, and the importance of these competencies in enhancing the educational process in the Korean schools. In spite of the fact that the teachers appreciated the usefulness of educational technology in developing education, they haven’t acquired the competencies and the majority of these teachers use only audio and video tapes in teaching.
            Clausen, (1992) tried to determine the American technology teachers’ perception of the necessary competences for success inside the classroom. A questionnaire that consisted of 109 items was sent to three groups of participants: Teacher trainers specialized in educational technology, teacher of educational technology, Supervisors of educational technology.
            Al Sabah, (1994) conducted a study on a sample of 309 male and female teachers in 28 public and private teachers colleges in Jordan. He used a questionnaire that consisted of 48 educational technology competencies grouped under four main sections: student’s personalities, planning, educational design, and evaluation. The results of the study indicated the following: The teachers highly acquired 34 competencies, Utilize 9 competencies effectively, 17 competencies are of great importance to the teachers, 29 competences are of middle importance to them, No significant differences attributed to gender existed with regard to acquiring and utilizing the competency. A significant positive correlation existed between acquiring the competency and utilizing it.
            Al Ghazawy & Al Tobagy (1991) conducted a study in Kuwait which aimed at identifying a list of teachers competencies in educational communication media which the teacher must acquire during his undergraduate training program. The sample consisted of 165 educational technology specialists in Kuwait The researcher used  a questionnaire of 36 competencies specified under the following domains: (1) utilization, (2) design, (3) selection, (4) production, (5) evaluation of educational communication media, (6) operation of educational equipments, (7) principles of perception, education and communication, (8) discipline, (9) services of educational communication unit, and (10) educational research in the field of educational communication. The results of this study revealed the following: The utilization of educational communication media, the selection of media, and operating the equipments are the most important. Communication and systems, and educational research are the least important.
            Al Sharee (1996) conducted a study in the Arab Republic of Yemen to see how far the programs of preparing social studies teachers consider the educational and psychological principles of educational technology. The study sample included 22 teachers and 264 students in the Faculty of education in Sanaa University. He used a questionnaire of 101 items representing principles of educational technology that were divided into 7 main domains as follows: objectives, content, activities, evaluation, methods, role of staff member, role of student and the learning environment. The result showed the following: The educational and psychological principles of educational technology were considered only for a limited extent when designing teacher training programs, there were no significant differences that can be attributed to gender between the responses of staff members and the students’.
            Al Nagar (1997) studied the educational technology competencies of elementary school teachers in Jordan and their utilization of these competencies from their own perspective; considering the variables of stage, gender, qualification, and experience. His sample included 584 male and female in Irbid region. He used a list of 70 competencies divided into three main domains: designing instruction, educational communication media, and evaluation. The results revealed the following: The teachers indicated that they acquire 62 high level competencies, 7 middle level competencies, and 1 low level competency; The teachers indicated that they utilize 46 competencies to a big extent, 21 competencies to a middle extent, and 3 competencies to a limited extent.  (http//faculty.ksu.edu.sa/25175/Pages/EducationalTeachnology.aspx download August 8)
II.Methodology
            In view of the nature of the research problem, the descriptive correlation method of research will be employed. This type of research will involve fact finding procedures as regards to conditions or relationships that exist, practices that prevail, beliefs or points of view that are being felt, or trends that are developing.
            This type of research methodology also involves the application of appropriate statistical tool in the analysis and interpretation of data.
            Since the study will determine the competencies of teachers, it is but appropriate that the descriptive research design is to be used.
Data Gathering Instrument
            The data gathering instrument to be used in this study will be a questionnaire checklist which is composed of two parts.
            Part 1 provides for information on the respondent’s personal profile.
            Part 2 will be to determine the teaching based competencies of secondary school teachers in the District of New Washington under the three broad areas namely: instructional competencies, educational leadership competencies, and the personal and social competencies. Instructional competencies will be further divided into three sub areas namely: subject matter competency, teaching presentation competency and language competency.
            The responses to the items and their assigned weights and interpretation will be as follows:
                        Weight                                     Responses/ Interpretation
                        5.00                                         Very Highly Competent
                        4.00 to 4.99                             Highly Competent
                        3.00 to 3.99                             Moderately Competent
                        2.00 to 2.99                             Fairly Competent
                        0.     to 1.99                             Incompetent
Validity of the Research
            A research is said to be valid if it measure what it is supposed to measure.
            The validity of the questionnaire on the competency of teachers will be established through the face validity techniques.
            The face draft of the questionnaire will be subjected to a face validation by (3) three experts composed of: one college department head, college supervisor and one college instructor. These identified validators will validate the researcher prepared questionnaire according to the criteria set by Good and Scates.
Reliability of the Questionnaire
            The questionnaire will be pretested for reliability and permission will be asked from the college head to use their teachers as respondents of the study.
            The split half method will be used by the researchers to determine the reliability of the whole questionnaire. According to Garret:
            The split half is regarded by many as the best of methods for measuring test reliability its main advantage being all the data for computing reliability are obtained upon one occasion.
Procedure for Analysis of Data
            The following procedures will be observed in the tabulation and analysis of the research instrument which will be used in the study.
            To establish the level of competencies of secondary school teachers in the District of New Washington, the responses into the questionnaire which are 3,2, and 1 will be scaled as follows:

                                    Scale of Instructors Competence
                                    Rating                          Description
                                    5.00                             Very Highly Competent
                                    4.00 to 4.99                 Highly Competent
                                    3.00 to 3.99                 Moderately Competent
                                    2.00 to 2.99                 Fairly Competent
                                    0.     to 1.99                 Incompetent

References
1)      Analoui, F. (1995). Teachers as Managers: An Exploration into Teaching Styles. International Journal of Educational Management, 9(5), 16-19.
2)      Bowden, J. and Masters, G. (1993). Implications for Higher Education of a Competency-Based Approach to Education and Training.
3)      Blake, David. andLandsdell, Fenny. (2000). Quality in Initial Teacher Education. 8(2), 63-69. MCB University Press.
4)      Cobb, R. The Relationship between Self-Regulated Learning Behaviors and Academic Performance in Web-Based Courses. Dissertation Doctor of Philosophy, Faculty of Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; 2003.
5)      Hargreaves, A. and Fullan, M. (2000). Mentoring in the New Millennium: Theory into Practice. 39(1), 50-56.
6)      Hodson, R. and Sullivan, T. (1995). Professions and Professionals. The Social Organization of Work, 287-314. Wadsworth, Belmont.
7)      Lusch, R.F. and O’Brein, M. (1997). Fostering Professionalism. Marketing Research, 9(1), 24-30.
8)      Munoz, P., Carmen, R., Pacheco, E., Fernandez, R. and Baltasar. (2000). The ideal Teacher: Implications for Student Evaluation of Teacher Effectiveness. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(3).
9)      Dr. Saad Abdel Rahman El-Dayel, Riyadh Teachers College Department of Educational Technology: How Far The Staff Members in Riyadh Teachers College Master and Utilize The Educational Technology Competencies from Their Own Perspective, 2004.
10)  Shestack, J.j.(1998). Taking Professionalism Seriously. ABA Journal, 84(8),70.
11)  Taylor, V., Middleton III, R. and NNapier, L. A Comparison of Perceptions of the Importance of MTh: Competencies between In-Service and Pre-Service Teachers. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mid-South Education Research Assciation. November 19th, 1990. New Orleans. 1990. 14-16.
12)  Woodruffe, C. (1993). What is Meant By a Competency. Leadership & Organizational Development Journal, 14(1), 29-36.
Department of Education. (2010). Discussion Paper on the Enhanced K + 12 Basic Education Program.
Department of Education (2011). K to 12 Basic Education Program Primer.
Quismundo, T. (2011, October 7) DepEd readies K+12 curricula for next year.
Philippine Daily Inquirer. Retrieved from http://multillingualphilippines.com/?p=5350
DepEd Updates. Retieved from http://www.deped.gov.ph/
Department of Education. (2010). Briefer on the Enhanced k12 basic education program. Retrieved from http://www.gov.ph/2010/11/02/briefer-on-the-enhanced-k-12-basic-education-program/
https://tacurongdeped.wordpress.com/2010/12/15/k12-education-program-of-deped/